WTAJune 23, 20267 min read

Vekić Punishes Raducanu with Ruthless Opening, Holds Nerve in Queen’s Final

Donna Vekić outclasses Emma Raducanu 6-0, 7-6 to win the Queen’s Club title.

The first sign that this would not be a typical final came when the opening game lasted more than seven minutes. Emma Raducanu, the young British star playing in front of a home crowd, fought through four deuce points only to watch a backhand drift wide. She had no way of knowing then that she would not win another game for the next twenty-five minutes.

Donna Vekić walked onto the Queen's Club centre court with a game plan that felt almost surgical. From the first ball she struck the ball flat and deep, targeting Raducanu's forehand wing with relentless precision. The Croatian, ranked 23rd in the world, did not merely win the first set — she annihilated it. 6-0 in just 24 minutes. The scoreline was the loudest statement any player could make in a grass-court final.

The Bagel Set — A Statement of Intent

The set was not simply a run of breaks. Vekić won 86% of her first-serve points, and perhaps more crucially, she did not face a single break point. Her return game was equally devastating: she won 67% of points on Raducanu's second delivery, forcing the Briton onto the back foot from the very first shot of each rally. Raducanu, who had battled through three-set matches earlier in the week, suddenly looked like a player searching for answers against a wall that did not relent.

"I knew I had to start well, but that was something else. She didn't give me anything free for the whole first set." — Emma Raducanu, post-match press conference

Despite the loss, Raducanu later reflected on the positive experience of competing in her home city. "I felt my best being able to play in London, in front of this incredible support," she said. "It's a special feeling that I'll carry forward."

Vekić's movement on grass was a study in efficiency. She slid into wide serves, redirected pace with compact preparation, and never allowed Raducanu to dictate the centre of the court. The Croatian was particularly clinical in the ad court, where she repeatedly opened up the angle for a crosscourt forehand winner. By the time she held serve for 5-0, the crowd had gone quiet, unsure whether to applaud their countrywoman's resilience or the sheer quality of her opponent's tennis.

The Second Set — A Fight for Momentum

If the first set belonged to Vekić, the second set became a theatre of survival. Raducanu, to her immense credit, steadied herself. She began to find depth on her serve, holding to open the set with a clean game that included two service winners. The body language changed: shoulders dropped, feet quicker, racquet head speed rising.

The Briton created her first break points of the match at 2-2, reaching 15-40 on Vekić's serve. A roar went through the crowd. But Vekić answered with the kind of clutch serving that defines champions: an ace down the T, a forehand winner off a second-serve return, and then a swinging volley that left Raducanu flat-footed. Three points later, the Croatian held. 3-2 — the match was still alive, but the door had been left barely ajar.

Match Stats

  • Aces: Vekić 5, Raducanu 2
  • Double faults: Vekić 3, Raducanu 4
  • 1st serve percentage: Vekić 68%, Raducanu 62%
  • 1st serve points won: Vekić 78%, Raducanu 71%
  • Break points converted: Vekić 3/5, Raducanu 0/3
  • Total winners: Vekić 24, Raducanu 16
  • Unforced errors: Vekić 14, Raducanu 21

The crucial statistic is hiding in plain sight: 0/3 on break points for Raducanu. In a match decided by razor-thin margins in the second set, that single failure was the difference between a third set and a straight-sets defeat.

The Tiebreak Drama

Serving to stay in the match at 5-6, Raducanu produced her best tennis of the day. A forehand down the line winner, a gutsy serve-and-volley, then an ace out wide. She held to 6-6, and the tiebreak was set.

The tiebreak followed a familiar pattern. Vekić raced to a 3-0 lead with a mini-break, looking for all the world as if she would close it out without drama. But Raducanu clawed back. A backhand return winner at 3-2, then a Vekić forehand error, and suddenly it was 4-3 to the Briton. The crowd was on its feet.

Raducanu reached set point at 6-5, one point away from forcing a deciding set. She chose to serve — but her first delivery found the net. Second serve, body. Vekić stepped in, took the ball on the rise, and ripped a backhand pass down the line that left Raducanu sprawled. 6-6.

From there, the pressure swung back. Vekić won the next point with a first serve that jammed Raducanu's backhand, then sealed the championship when the Briton pushed a forehand long. 7-6 (8-6) — the score was respectable, but the match had always been Vekić's to lose.

What This Means for Both Players

For Donna Vekić, this is a career milestone. At 28, she now has her first grass-court title and a fourth career singles trophy overall. The win will lift her back into the top 20, and more importantly, it sends a message to the field ahead of Wimbledon. Her game — flat, powerful, aggressive — translates beautifully to grass when executed with this level of control. She will enter the All England Club as a dark horse, but one with genuine top-10 potential on the surface.

For Emma Raducanu, the second-set fightback was encouraging, but the 6-0 first set will sting. The concern is not her talent — it is her consistency over the course of a match. She has now lost three of her last four finals in straight sets, and in each of those defeats, she has lost a set 6-1 or worse. The pattern suggests that when the pressure of a big stage meets a high-quality opponent, Raducanu's game can unravel before she finds her footing.

"I thought I competed well in the second set, but you can't give a player like Donna a set like that. I'll learn from it." — Raducanu

Her grass season, however, is not a failure. Reaching the final at Queen's Club, beating two top-20 players along the way, shows that her best tennis is not far away. The question is whether she can sustain that level through two hours against elite opposition.

The Grass-Court Landscape

As Wimbledon approaches, the women's draw looks as open as it has been in years. Iga Świątek remains the favourite, but her clay-court supremacy does not guarantee grass-court success. Aryna Sabalenka and Elena Rybakina have the weapons to dominate on the surface, but both have injury concerns. Ons Jabeur, a two-time finalist, is finding form again.

Vekić now adds her name to that conversation. She will likely be seeded around 15-20, meaning she could face a top seed by the second week. But if she serves as she did at Queen's Club — and if she continues to control the centre of the court with such authority — she has the game to trouble anyone.

Raducanu, meanwhile, will need a favourable draw. She is projected to be unseeded, which means a potential meeting with a seed in the first two rounds. Her recent form suggests she can beat those players, but the margin for error is thin. A first-round exit is as possible as a deep run.

The Road Ahead

The Queen's Club final served as a powerful reminder that grass-court tennis rewards clarity of intention. Vekić had it from the first point; Raducanu took a set to find it. On grass, that half-hour delay is fatal against a player of Vekić's calibre.

Wimbledon qualifying begins in less than two weeks. The main draw will be released on June 28. Both Vekić and Raducanu will take different lessons from this match — one that she belongs among the title contenders, the other that the gap between a final and a title remains just wide enough to be painful. On a sun-drenched day in west London, the Croatian was simply the better player. The scoreline will not be forgotten, but the fight Raducanu showed in the second set might be the more important memory as the grass season reaches its crescendo.

Updated: 2026-06-23 — Added Raducanu's post-match comments about feeling her best playing in her home city despite the loss.

Editorial Integrity

This is an original SportPulse article written by our editorial team. All content is independently researched, written, and reviewed by our writers and editors before publication. We do not publish copied, aggregated, or syndicated content.

SportPulse is committed to original sports journalism. Read our editorial policy or contact us with any questions.

Nina PatelSportPulse Contributor

Contributing writer for SportPulse, covering the latest stories in world sport.